Tibetan Geshe Lobsang Soepa & Peace Researcher Josef Mühlbauer – what can peace studies learn from a Monk?

After the pūjā with Geshe Lobsang Soepa, peace researcher Josef Mühlbauer conducted an interview with the Geshe [highest title to monks] on the topic of peace.

But first let me say few words on pūjā. In Tibetan Buddhism (as well as in Hinduism), a pūjā is a ritual act of offering, prayer, and devotion. It can include chanting, making offerings such as water, incense, flowers, or food, and reciting prayers or mantras. The purpose is to honor enlightened beings, accumulate merit, remove obstacles, and generate positive energy for oneself and others. In the Tibetan context, pūjās are often performed by monks or practitioners for healing, protection, or blessings. Here Geshe Lobsang Soepa did a pūjā in the beautiful Art Gallery Bella Volen.

The Tibetan monk – Geshe Lobsang Soepa, who went to visit many world leaders like for example Volodymyr Zelensky, explained in the interview with peace researcher Josef Mühlbauer that human beings are fundamentally interconnected and therefore inherently social. We must live, eat, drink, and walk together; otherwise, we remain isolated. He emphasized that, in order to achieve peace, we must address the root causes of conflict. Just as in medicine it would be misguided to treat only the symptoms rather than the underlying disease, so too in conflict resolution we must look beyond surface manifestations. He further remarked that humanity constitutes a single family, and our common home is the world. From this perspective, borders and nationalism can be understood as obstacles to uniting the human family. He stressed that our attention should be directed toward what is within our power to change. War and conflict are human-made social problems; therefore, they can be transformed. There is, he concluded, no such thing as a God-given or God-justified war.

The monk also created a sand mandala in Vienna, and of course I was curious about what we can learn from this practice in peace studies?

A sand mandala (from Sanskrit maṇḍala, “circle”) is an intricate geometric design made with colored sand, often depicting the dwelling place of a Buddhist deity or a cosmological map of the universe. Monks create it as a spiritual practice, not as “art” in the Western sense. The process is often accompanied by prayers, chanting, and meditation. The act of creating and dissolving the mandala is meant to generate compassion, healing, and balance, both for the participants and for the wider community. Sand Mandalas help students and practitioners reflect on how conflicts, like mandalas, are impermanent and subject to transformation. They highlight the process over the outcome. Peace building is not only about the final agreement but about the process of dialogue, trust-building, and patience. It can be seen as a metaphor in the sense that peace is often fragile and can be easily disrupted like the sand grains in the Sand Manadala. Just like the sand, peace requires careful arrangement. And the Sand Manadala is like the monk said in the interview with Peace Researcher Josef Mühlbauer, it is a symbol of geometry that symbolizes the interconnectedness of all beings. This is an insight that is crucial to understand systemic, epistemic and structural violence.

Geshe Lobsang Soepa is a Tibetan Buddhist monk, teacher and master of ritual arts. Born in the U-Tsang province of Tibet (near Lhasa); his birth name was Norsang. The name Lobsang Soepa was given by the 14th Dalai Lama. After facing political pressure and imprisonment under Chinese authorities for refusing to renounce monastic life, he escaped to India.

Josef Mühlbauer (born 1987) is an Austrian political scientist, peace researcher, journalist, and author. He works as a university assistant at the University of Graz, particularly in the field of Global Governance and Peace & Conflict Studies. His research interests include socio-ecological transformation, political theory, international relations, political education, and critical approaches to peace (e.g. critical peace studies).

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 (UNSCR 1325) – at the Swedish Embassy in Vienna

Pathways to Peace: Legal Accountability and Feminist PeacebuildingPanel discussion on feminist peace and security policy

Glad to had the wonderful opportunity to be invited at the Swedish Embassy in Austria! – Short Report by Peace Researcher Josef Mühlbauer (University of Graz)

My Takewaways from the Panel Discussion on the UNSCR 1325:

The UNSC Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security isn’t a niche Issue, it’s a strategic imperative and a pathway to peace. Before UNSCR 1325, the work of women in peacebuilding was often informal, overlooked, and underfunded. The resolution, adopted unanimously in 2000, elevated women’s participation from a „nice-to-have“ to a mandatory component of international peace and security efforts. It provided a legal and political basis for advocates to hold governments and the UN itself accountable.

Milestone in Peace Building/ Peace Keeping & Peace Research: On October 31, 2000, the UN Security Council made history. For the first time, it recognized that war impacts women differently—and that women are not just victims, but powerful agents of peace. This was the birth of Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security (WPS).

Why is the UNSCR 1325 so important?

It is important because sustainable peace is only possible when women are equally included. Studies show that peace agreements are 35% more likely to last at least 15 years when women are involved in their creation. UNSCR 1325 isn’t just about fairness; it’s about effectiveness, it is about resiliant peace!

Key facts & milestones – Four Pillars of Peace

2000: UNSCR 1325 is adopted unanimously.

2009: The US becomes the first country to launch a National Action Plan (NAP) to implement the resolution.

2015: A Global Study on the implementation of UNSCR 1325 is published, highlighting both progress and critical gaps.

Today: Over 100 countries have adopted National Action Plans.

Pillar 1 Participation: It calls for increased representation and meaningful participation of women at all levels of decision-making, including in peace processes, conflict prevention, and post-conflict governance. This means women should be at the negotiating table, not just as observers but as mediators, negotiators, and signatories.

Pillar 2 Protection: It requires parties to conflict to take special measures to protect women and girls from gender-based violence, including rape and other forms of sexual abuse, in situations of armed conflict. This was a critical recognition of rape as a weapon of war.

Pillar 3 Prevention: It calls for integrating a gender perspective into conflict prevention efforts and early warning systems. This means understanding the different ways men and women experience and signal the onset of conflict.

Pillar 4 Relief and Recovery: It mandates the integration of a gender perspective into all humanitarian and post-conflict reconstruction programs. This ensures that the specific needs of women and girls (e.g., access to healthcare, education, and economic opportunities) are addressed in refugee camps, disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) programs, and in rebuilding institutions.

Lets honor Sweden’s Pioneering Role 🇸🇪

Sweden has been a global leader in turning the principles of 1325 into action:

In 2014, Sweden became the first country in the world to officially adopt a feminist foreign policy, with the WPS agenda at its core.

The agenda is far from complete. As we face new conflicts and challenges, the principles of 1325 are more critical than ever. Just look at #Sudan#Gaza#Afghanistan ..

Lets honor the Speakers:

(c)Minitta Kandlbauer/VIDC, Swedish Embassy 10.9.2025

H.E. Annika Ben David, Sweden’s Ambassador to Austria and Slovakia as well as Sweden’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations in Vienna

H.E. Manizha Bakhtari, Ambassador and Permanent Representative Ambassador of Afghanistan in Vienna

Julia Prummer, Policy Advisor for the Austrian Foreign Minister, Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs

Jennifer Sarvary Bradford, Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Officer, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime

Dima Hussain, Legal Scholar, European University Institute in Florence and Centre for Religious Studies at the Central European University Vienna

Waruguru Gaitho, Gates Cambridge International Scholar of Law, Centre for Gender Studies at the University of Cambridge

Moderation: Miriam Mona Mukalazi, VIDC Global Dialogue

Critical Remarks on the UNSCR 1325:

There is unfortunately a gap between commitment/statements/declarations and the reality on the ground. While the norm is established, implementation is lagging. Women are still grossly underrepresented in formal peace processes. For example, between 1992 and 2019, women constituted only 13% of negotiators, 6% of mediators, and 6% of signatories in major peace processes. In conflicts from Ukraine to Sudan, Yemen, and the DRC, sexual violence continues to be used as a tactic of war, and women’s voices are often sidelined in humanitarian response and peace talks.

Author: Josef Mühlbauer BA BA MA (University Assistent at the University of Graz) is a peace researcher, published several books and peer reviewed academic articles, is a scientific researcher at Empowerment for Peace and the GSIS Institute. He is also the host of the Varna Peace YouTube Channel.

Panel Discussion on Panic & Worlds in Disorder – Peace Research & Peace Studies at The ARS Electronica Festival 2025

ARC Electronica Festical 2025, Panel Discussion on Worlds in Disorder with Peace Researcher Josef Mühlbauer

From a peace research perspective, our panel deconstructed the connections between geopolitics, the current global rise of right-wing extremism, and the legacy of the failed US-led intervention in Afghanistan. You can watch the whole event and the panel discussion on the YouTube Channel of ARS Electronica.

Panel Discussion Worlds in Disorder. With Josef Mühlbauer (Moderator), Stephanie Fenkart, Natascha Strobl & Emran Feroz at the ARS Electronica Festival 2025 in the Postcity Conference Hall in Linz.

We analyzed how the failure of the US-led invasion and intervention in Afghanistan (since 2001) exemplifies the fundamental flaws of liberal interventionism and the limits of imposed peace through military means (the so called „liberal Peacebuilding). This failure has not only created a humanitarian crisis but has also severely damaged the credibility of Western powers (and values), creating a power vacuum and accelerating a shift towards a more multipolar—and yet unstable—world order. Fenkart made the argument that the EU must step up, and realize its strategic autonomy.

The discussion critically examined how this geopolitical disillusionment and the narratives of „endless, futile wars“ are exploited by right-wing populist and extremist movements. These groups weaponize the legacy of intervention to fuel isolationism, xenophobia, and a rejection of multilateral institutions, thereby undermining the very frameworks designed to maintain international peace and security. Strobl pointed out that we wittness a global rise of fascism.

Ultimately, the panel argued that these are not isolated crises but symptoms of a deeper breakdown. We concluded that a sustainable path forward requires a critical peacebuilding approach: moving beyond militarized responses, addressing the root causes of conflict and radicalization (such as inequality and political disenfranchisement), and rebuilding trust through accountable diplomacy and support for inclusive civil societies.

The interaction with the audiance was vivid and showed the lively engagement of the audiance with the panelists.

Here you can find all the participants: https://ars.electronica.art/panic/en/view/worlds-in-disorder-understanding-times-of-political-change-and-uncertainty-23038ddb450c80988a7adb408ec1c7ed/

Visit the YouTube Channel of ARS Electronica: https://www.youtube.com/@arselectronica